Hoofdmenu
Hoofdpagina Over Forces... Thema's Posters Artikelen Analyses Media Horror Stories Vliegen Links Forces NL Forum Discussies Commentaren Steun Forces Archief
Navigatie
Hoofdpagina Zoekpagina Inhoudsopgave Wist U...? All Time Favs
Internationaal
Forces Psychiatry
Canada
Toronto
Manitoba (email)
Italy
New Zealand
UK (email)
Russia
VS afdelingen
California
Connecticut
Duluth
Georgia
Hawaï
Indiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Minnesota
USA
Virginia
Affiliates
Smokers' Club
NYC C.L.A.S.H.
Smoking Paradise
MA Citizens for
Freedom
Real Texas Freedom
Ontario Smoking
Forces Comité
van Aanbeveling
| |
Selectieve massahysterie in de VS
Een aantal artikelen uit alt.smokers die aangeven hoe selectief
Amerikaanse gezondheidsorganisaties met de omgeving om gaan: streng tegen
rokers, zacht tegen de industrie.
Californians seek smoke-free outdoor air
By Deena Beasley
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Forced out of restaurants, ousted from bars,
smokers continue to retreat in health-conscious California as nonsmokers
demand, and increasingly get, smoke-free outdoor air as well.
Smokers who in 1998 lost the once-inalienable right to smoke and drink at the
same time, at least in public bars, now are being restricted by some
businesses and local governments to certain limited areas of the great
outdoors.
"Only 16 to 17 percent of Californians smoke. Nonsmokers are less willing
to accept the annoyance and unpleasantness now that smoking has been banned
indoors," said Dr. David Burns, a spokesman for the American Lung
Association of California.
California began in 1994 to phase in its ban on smoking in nearly all indoor
workplaces. The trend has since spread throughout the country and around the
world.
Now some complain that the ban on indoor smoking means more smoke outside --
on restaurant patios, in doorways of buildings, shopping centers, parks and
other public places where everyone around is exposed to the secondhand smoke.
"The anti-smoking movement in California is reaching absurd levels. The
outdoors is the last bastion, after one's own home, now that they have closed
down smoking in bars and restaurants," National Smokers Alliance
spokesman Eric Schippers said.
The city of San Diego is expected to approve an ordinance barring smokers from
lighting up within 50 feet of public playgrounds and recreation centers.
THE WORLD IS THEIR ASHTRAY
The new law, which is expected to go into effect next year, was spurred by
complaints of toxic cigarette butts piling up near areas where children play.
"Unfortunately, the smoking industry encourages smokers to think of the
world as their ashtray and playgrounds have a lot of sand," said Debbie
Kelly, a spokeswoman for the Lung Association in San Diego.
"That same 50-foot space will be passed by five municipal buses and three
trucks, but I guess its OK to breath those fumes," the smokers alliance's
Schippers said.
More than 50,000 people die prematurely each year from prolonged exposure to
secondhand smoke, which contributes to diseases including lung cancer, heart
disease and asthma, according to the Lung Association.
"There is a tendency for smokers to congregate in certain locations,
outside of restaurants or doorways. This creates conflict with nonsmokers who
are also outside," Burns said.
The problem is made worse at some large office buildings because their
powerful ventilation systems draw in the smoke every time the door opens, the
association says.
The trend to restrict outdoor smoking has been particularly pronounced at
hospitals and other medical facilities such as health maintenance organization
Kaiser Permanente, which has barred outdoor smoking at its Southern California
centers since Jan. 1.
"We wanted, as a preventive health care organization, to set an example
and encourage employees to quit smoking," said Denise Schaefer, manager
of Kaiser's smokers health line. She said feedback from the anti-smoking
campaign has been very positive.
Although Kaiser employees now have nowhere to smoke, the ban is "kind of
like seat belts -- it's not 100 percent enforced. They can go to their
cars," Schaefer said.
Disneyland began to restrict smoking to four designated areas this year. Until
January, visitors to the Anaheim theme park had been allowed to light up as
long as they were not on a ride, waiting in line, or in transit, eating or
store areas.
"We feel we've accommodated both sides. We've eliminated the uncertainty
about where you could or could not smoke within the park," said Ray
Gomez, a Disneyland spokesman.
People who do not like cigarette smoke appreciate the move and smokers like
the guidance, spelled out in a brochure they receive at entry, and the fact
that puffing zones are away from mainstream traffic, he said.
The manager of a Starbucks coffee shop in the northern California town of
Auburn decided three months ago to ban smokers from the store's outdoor patio.
"We were having constant customer feedback that it would be really nice
if they didn't have to breathe all that smoke," manager John Shanahan
said.
Local authorities allow businesses to dictate activity on premises they own or
rent, he noted, adding: "The police have been very supportive. We have
had customers who refused to put out their cigarettes."
California bar owners and the tobacco industry lobbied ferociously, but
unsuccessfully, to repeal the state's ban on smoking, arguing that it would
damage business.
But a spokeswoman for the California Restaurant Association, Kristin Olsen,
said there has been no concrete evidence so far to show that the ban has
affected revenues. "We have noticed that more restaurants and bars are
building patios to accommodate smokers," she added.
"People who expect to be able to smoke need to be able to do so
responsibly, not at the inconvenience of other people," said Lung
Association spokesman Burns.
*+*
Researchers Defend Humans in Study
By TOM VERDIN
.c The Associated Press
LOMA LINDA, Calif. (AP) - Doctors doing a study of a toxic water
pollutant defended feeding it to human participants, saying the potential
medical benefit outweighed the risk.
The Loma Linda University Medical Center researchers held a news conference
Tuesday to respond to media reports raising concerns about people being given
doses of perchlorate, a chemical used in rocket fuel that has contaminated
ground water in parts of Southern California.
The hospital's institutional review board, which oversees clinical trials,
concluded that participants would face minimal risk. Researchers said the
perchlorate doses being given in the study are about 100 times lower than
those given to people who are prescribed perchlorate for thyroid illnesses.
Dr. Anthony Firek, the study's principal investigator, said the dosages are
also lower than those given in a study published earlier this year by Harvard
University. Nine men received 10 milligrams of perchlorate daily in that
study.
Loma Linda researchers are giving participants doses ranging from a
half-milligram to three milligrams. Half of the participants get placebos.
But the daily doses in the Loma Linda study are still up to 83 times higher
than drinking-water limits for perchlorate recommended by California's
Department of Health Services.
Dr. William Saukel, chairman of Loma Linda's review board, said the study
likely will produce information beneficial to the population as a whole.
So far, just eight people have enrolled in the study, which began in early
October. Researchers hope to eventually enroll 100 people who each will be
paid $1,000 for seven months of participation.
Participants are informed of the risks of the research, which include bone
marrow suppression, lessening of white and red blood cell counts and thyroid
problems.
Lockheed Martin - which faces hundreds of lawsuits accusing it of creating
perchlorate pollution and threatening the health of San Bernardino and
Riverside counties' residents - is paying for the study. The aerospace
company's officials have said the study will help determine the health risk of
perchlorate.
Barry Taylor, Loma Linda's vice president for research affairs, said
university officials discussed the company's possible motivations. ``But on
the other hand,'' he said, ``people on the committee recognized that they
could see medical use coming out of this.''
The idea for the study came from medical researchers, not Lockheed,
researchers said.
Firek said the study is being conducted to determine how best to diagnose
and treat any illnesses caused by perchlorate in drinking water.
Perchlorate has been used as a rocket-fuel oxidizer since the 1940s, and is
thought to have contaminated water supplies in parts of Riverside and San
Bernardino counties, as well as the San Gabriel Valley east of Los Angeles.
In large doses, it can slow down the thyroid, which produces the hormone that
controls infants' brain development and growth in older children. In adults,
the thyroid regulates such things as temperature and blood cholesterol. Some
people with thyroid illnesses are prescribed perchlorate to help treat their
conditions.
Firek indicated that doctors treating such patients are seeing some problems
they think could be related to perchlorate. A clinical trial is the only way
to determine whether that is the case, he said.
On the Net:
Perchlorate information: http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/perchlor/perchlo.html
Loma Linda Medical Center: http://www.llu.edu/llumc/
"There has never been a time like this, in which we have the power to
create knowledge and the power to create havoc, and both those powers rest in
the same
hands," --clinton
| |
|